Iranian Peoples: Sarmatians
Women Warriors - the Sarmatians
"They have no right
breasts...for while they are yet babies their mothers make red-hot a
bronze instrument constructed for this very purpose and apply it to the
right breast and cauterize it, so that its growth is arrested, and all its
strength and bulk are diverted to the right shoulder and right arm."
Iranian Women Warriors
By Shapour Suren-Pahlav
Sarmatian Matriarchy and Amazon Women
The most fascinating feature of Iranian-Sarmatian culture is their women
warriors. Herodotus reported that the Sarmatians were said to be the offspring
of Scythians who had mated with Amazons and that their female descendants
"have continued from that day to the present to observe their ancient
[Amazon] customs, frequently hunting on horseback with their husbands; in
war taking the field; and wearing the very same dress as the men"
Moreover, said Herodotus, "No girl shall wed till she has killed a
man in battle."
and Hippocrates accounts inform us the Sarmatians took interest in turning
their women into strong-armed huntresses and fighters. Archaeological
materials seem to confirm Sarmatian women's active role in military
operation and social life. Burial of armed Sarmatian women comprise large
percent of the military burial in the group occupy the central position
and appear the be the richest.
- Blyumenfeld culture, 6th - 4th century B.C.
The Sauromatians were the eastern neighbors of the Scythians and both were
kindred tribes of Iranian people. The relations between the Sauromatians
and the Scythians were peaceful between the 6th to 4th centuries B.C.
According to Herodotus, the Sauromatians fought with the Scythians against
Darius the Great in the 5th century B.C.
- Prokhorovskaya culture, 4th - 2th century B.C.
The term "Sarmatian" or "Sirmatian" was first
mentioned by Greek authors such as Eudox, Pseudo-Skilak, Heraklidus of
Pont, and Theophrastus in the 4th-2nd century B.C. According to the
researchers, the Early Sarmatian culture most probably developed as a
result of the influx of populations from the forest-steppe trans-Urals,
northwestern modern Kazakhstan, and the Aral Sea region. In the 4th
century B.C. individual Sarmatian groups penetrated into the lower Volga
River region, where Sauromatian dominated the area. From the 4th to 2nd
centuries B.C., massive nomadic migrations westward from the southern Ural
steppes reached the lower Don River and Kuban River regions and absorbed
the local Sauromatiansa. During the 3rd century B.C. new powerful
Sarmatian tribes were formed - the Aorsi, the Roxolani, the Alans, and the
Iazyges advanced westwards. The massive Sarmatian western expansion
ultimately brought down Scythian rule in the North Black Sea area between
the end of the 3rd century and early 2nd century B.C.
Geography we know that in the 2nd century B.C., the Iazyges settled
between the Don and the Dnieper while the Roxolani occupied the Black Sea
steppes and conducted raids on Taurida (The Crimea). In the middle of the
1st century, the Roxolani reached further west around Danube and
threatening the eastern provinces of Rome.
Some of the
new burial traits during this time include side niches (podbois),
catacombs, grave pits with ledges, and the southern orientation of the
deceased. Animal style ornamentation began to die out. New types of
swords, bronze mirrors, and decorations started to appear and the earlier
Sauromatian style pottery underwent significant changes. The tribes from
the trans-Ural steppes brought new techniques for pottery manufacturing,
including the mixing of talc into the paste. New forms such as
round-bottom pots and uniquely rich ornamental motifs were incorporated
into the Sarmatian pottery style.
Sarmatian - Suslovo cultures, late 2nd century B.C. - 2nd century A.D.
The Middle Sarmatian culture covered the steppes of Eurasia from the
Danube River to the southern Ural Steppes. During this time a sharp
decrease in the population occurred in the region because of deteriorating
climatic conditions in the southern Ural area and the tribal migration to
the west and southeast.
Sarmatian - the Alan or Shipovskaya cultures, 2nd - 4th century A.D.
Late Sarmatian sites were first identified by P.D. Rau, who also
associated the Late Sarmatian sites with the historical Alans. At the
beginning of the 1st century A.D., the Alans another Iranian group of
nomads had occupied lands in the northeast Azov Sea area, along the Don.
Based on the archaeological material they were one of the Iranian-speaking
nomadic tribes began to enter the Sarmatian area between the middle of the
1st and the 2nd century A.D. The written sources suggest that from the
second half of the 1st to 4th century A.D. the Alans had supremacy over
the tribal union and created a powerful confederation of tribes. They
continued to rule in the North Black Sea steppes until they were invaded
by the Huns in the late 4th century A.D. Most of the Alans were absorbed
by the Huns while a small number of them fled to the North Caucasus or
went west and reached the shores of Gibraltar.
One of the
most characteristic traits of the Late Sarmatian culture was the
artificial deformation of skulls. This was probably accomplished by tying
a soft cloth around the infant's head forcing an elongation of the
cranium. This cultural trait was specific to the populations living east
of the Don River and included the Southern Ural population. In contrast to
the Middle Sarmatian culture, the predominant orientation of the deceased
was to the north.
and Social Class
The religious practices were consistent among the Sauro-Sarmatian nomads.
They were typical of the Iranian-clan-tribal cults of pre-Zoroastrian.
Their gods were personified. Those gods of nature were the sky, the earth,
and fire. Gods pertaining to social concepts were the domestic hearth and
war. The evidence of fire cult practices is exemplified by charcoal and
ashes found in the burials.
The high amount of offensive weapons found in Sarmatian graves
indicates a military-oriented nomadic life. Some of the rich burial sites
of the Sarmatian aristocrats excavated in the Ural region indicates a
defined social stratification had developed for the nomadic society. Class
formation processes were accelerated greatly as the nomads from the
southern Ural steeps and Volga region advanced westward and came into
contact with Greek and Roman agriculture, industry, and trade centres.
From/Source: The Silk Road Foundation
has the privilege to publish the above article originating from the
above-mentioned source, for
educational purposes only (Read Only). This
article has been published in accordance with the author(s) / source'
copyright-policy -- therefore, the ownership and copyright of this
page-file remain with the author(s) / source. For any other purposes, you must obtain a
written permission from the copyright owner concerned. (Please
refer to CAIS Copyright Policy).