|
|
|
CAIS The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies
[ Home ] [ About CAIS ] [ Articles ] [ Daily News ] [ News Archive ] [ Announcements ] [ CAIS Seminars ] [ Image Library ] [ Copyright ] [ Disclaimer ] [ Submission ] [ Search ] [ Contact Us ] [ Links ] |
. .IRANIAN CULTURAL IMPACT Cultural and Cosmological Impact of Iranian Civilization in Vietnam and Peninsular Areas of Southeast Asia
By
Shahab Setudeh-Nejad
Sasanid
Iran (CE 226-651) played a leading role in the enrichment of the culture and
metamorphoses of Vietnam and other Southeast Asian states in particular along
the peninsular coasts of the Indo-Chinese zone of maritime trade. History of contacts between the Iranian world and the Far East dates from the
reign of Mithradates II the Great (123 BCE -- 87 BCE), when in 115 BCE, this
monarch of the Parthian Dynasty (258 BCE -- CE 226) received an envoy from the
emperor of China [Ghirshman 1971:69]. The arrival of caravans of goods
from Western Central Asia to the oases of the Tarim Basin and other overland
trade routes of the 'Silk Road' as far as Chinese Turkestan resulted in much
intercourse between China and its tributary states with Western Asia [Arberry
1953:25]. By the third century CE, Parthian Empire's trade routes were extended in the
maritime ports of Southeast Asia as far as the Malay Peninsula's international
port of Tun-sun, where the Iranian merchants had established settlements with no
less than 500 residents [Wheatley 1964:47]. Their activities extended to
the Indo-Chinese port of Tonking as such accounts on sea trade activities of the
Parthians were recorded by K'ang T'ai, Wu dynasty's envoy to the kingdom of
Funan in the delta of the Mekong in the first period of the third century of the
Christian era. China had been prevented by Parthia to receive envoys from Byzantium through
Iranian territory and was also denied direct access to the Mediterranean trade
on geopolitical considerations. As such the Chinese in pursuit of an
alternative trade route away from Central-Asian overland routes under Parthian
control were keeping an eye on Parthia's trade expansion on the maritime routes
of Southeast Asia [Wolters 1970:20,22,25]. Around this time, a technical innovation in the shipbuilding industry of the
Persian Gulf resulted in the construction of vessels with a rig that
accommodated the ships to sail nearer the wind. The knowledge of this
innovative development spread along the shores of the Indian Ocean and further
East [Wheatley 1964:34] at a time when the Sasanian dynasty replaced the
Parthians in Iran, and a more intensified period of Iranian cultural presence
became felt in Southeast Asia as the Sasanids monopolized the maritime trade of
the Far Eastern routes after the fourth century CE, having made profitable
treaties with the Chinese who referred in their historical records to the ships
of the 'Posse', or the Iranian trade. The Iranians were the
"carriers" of this trade [Moorhead 1965:59] and many vessels traveled
from southern China to Vietnam, and the Malay Pennisula in the direction of
India, Roman Orient and Western Asia. China's Southern Dynasties (420-589)
was involved in these transactions with the Sasanids [Wolters 1970:1]. Under these circumstances, Iranian ships with up to seven sails carrying as many
as 700 seamen and "a thousand metric tons of cargo" were plying in the
Indian Ocean in the direction of sea routes further East [Quaritch Wales
1965:41]. Vietnam was a major trade destination for the Iranian ships and
many of their merchants were established in the ports of Nam-Viet [Schafer
1967:180], as there was extensive intercourse between Sasanid Iran and Vietnam [Buttinger
1958:244] as late as the Chinese T'ang era when Iranian merchants established
settlements in Canton and other Chinese ports as well [Schafer 1976:28]. Indeed, there is evidence to show that Sasanid Iran exerted strong influences in
Vietnam, China and elsewhere in Southeast Asian world. These influences
were partly inspired by the golden age of Sasanian civilization which coincided
with the reign of Kuusru Anushirwan (531-579) in Iran. Under this Sasanin
king, better known as "Anushirwan The Just", Iranian culture and
metamorphosis spread to the Far East. Anushirwan attracted numerous
scholars and artisans to his court whose splendor and luxury "were
unsurpassed by that of any dynasty in the world's history" [Sykes
1963:465]. Anushirwan promoted the establishment of universities, where
scholars from India, Greece and Asia Minor indulged in various studies on
medicine, agriculture and sciences. His court was a center of East-West conferences of philosophers from various
parts of the world. Champa kingdom CE 150-1471 located east of Cambodia in
southern area of Vietnam neighbouring Annam benefited from the reign of Khusru
Anushirwan and the presence of Iranian settlers. As Schafer has pointed
out Sasanian cosmology was known to the Chams who had compiled the 'Book of
Anushirwan', a cosmological work which is said to be "sacred to the Chams"
[Schafer 1967:270, 325]. Schafer has further clarified that in
contemporary Vietnam, an Islamized people who reside in the villages of the
south, called "Orang Bani" claim descendancy from "Noursavan",
who was their first king; a name which is interpreted to be a term of reference
to Sasanid Anushirwan the Just of Iran [Schafer 1967:11]. There is also a
recorded tradition for the exchange of correspondence between the Khagan of
Tibet and Anushirwan who received a letter from the Khagan, and direct contact
of Tibetan court nobles with the Sasanian dynasty. In this respect,
imperial Sasanian impact on Tibetan court culture has been recognized in the
adoption of Sasanian style robes by the Tibetan nobles [Flood 1991:31]. Iranian cosmology in the Sasanian period was a doctrine which centered on
Mazdean interpretations of the Zoroastrian faith. It was a philosophical
metamorphosis which "supported the power of the ruler, regarded as just
king who preserved harmony between the different classes of society" [Hourani
1991:9]. In this context, Anushirwan's character appealed to the Oriental
rulers who recognized his reign to symbolize strength and justice. It is
noteworthy that long before the transmission of Sasanian cultural impact,
Vietnam had been receptive to Indo-Iranian and kin-Iranian influences entering
her shores as early as the first century CE, when Indo-Scythian Buddhist monks
reached here to propagate the Mahayana doctrine. By the end of the second century CE, K'ang Seng-hui, the famed Sogdian
monk reached Vietnam from China and introduced his teachings and translations of
Central Asian-impulsed Buddhist scriptures [Nguyen 1993:98]. Mahayana
Buddhism as a syncretic religious system was associated with higher learnings in
philosophy and arts, and it is conceivable that the Indo-Scythians, and Sogdians
and other Central-Asiatic peoples of Zoroastrian cultural orbit had exerted
influences on Buddhism some of which had also been adopted by the Vietnamese
aristocrats who welcomed Mahayanist traditions at a time when the Parthian
Empire was increasing its commercial presence along Southeast Asian coasts.
Moreover, Sogdiana from where K'ang Seng-hui hailed was a Western Central-Asian
state whose merchants had established settlements in the Far East since the
pre-Christian Era in places as far as Mongolia and China [Frye 1963:235].
The discovery of Sogdian inscriptions in Inner Tibet and in Western Himalayas
[Flood 1991:32] and the spread of its kin-Iranian cultural sphere in Southeast
Asia are among the cultural factors in support of the argument for the impact of
the diffusion of Partho-Sasanid culture and cosmology in Southeast Asia. I-tsing (I-Ching), a Chinese Buddhist pilgrim monk who was aboard a Iranian ship in 671
CE, just a few years after the end of Sasanid Era, has provided an interesting
account of the routes taken by the vessel on its way to Sre Vijaya where he
intended to stay. According to I-tsing, the Iranian ship left a Chinese
port toward Annam in northern Vietnam and then proceeded to Sri Vijaya. As
I-tsing has clarified, the voyage could involve sailing directly or around the
coasts of Cambodia, Siam, and the MalayPeninsula [Majumdar 1986:27-8].
Thus, from I-tsing's report we have a vivid picture of the maritime trade of
"the ships of Posse" in Indochina as well as the directions through
which cultural and cosmologicalsphere of Sasanid Iran reached Southeast Asian
ports of southern Vietnam under Champa rule. Nowadays archaeological finds around the peninsular areas of Southeast Asia have
also shed light on the extent of Sasanian presence which also confirms the
accuracy of I-tsing's accounts. Discovery of Sasanian coins in the
southern coast of Siam (Thailand) at Yarang in the Pattani area, which date from
the fifth century CE [Srisuchat 1990:28], and two silver coins of the Abbasid
Dynasty (CE 750-1258) at the Merbok estuary near the city state of Tan-Tan in
the Malay Peninsula [Wheatley 1964:75], and another find of a Sasanian cabochon
at Oc Eo port of Funan, situated in the lower valley of the Mekong [Myers;
Trewin 1988:138] are further testimony to a significant role of the Iranian
world in the trade and cultural enhancements of the states along the peninsular
regions of Southeast Asia. Iranian sea-borne trade in Southeast Asia was maintained until after the eighth
century in the very same routes as before. In CE 771, a famous passenger
whose ship was escorted by 35 Iranian vessels to Sri Vijaya on its way to China
was no other than Vajrabodi the Buddhist master of the Tantric sect [Majumdar
1986:28]. Between CE 670 to 673, Sasanid princes and court nobles of
Iranian who had survived the Muslim conquest of their country took refuge in
Central Asian states loyal to Sasanian dynasty and from its overland routes
arrived in China, having, thus "initiated a new wave of Iranian
influences" in China [Ghirshman 1971:92], and laid the foundations of
"Sino-Persian" arts some of which "caught the fancy of the Nara
court" further East in the Islands of Japan [Hayashi 1975:85,88,96-8, 129].
Indeed the extent of this rich cultural impact from the direction of Sasanian
civilization to the Far East was symbolized in the ninth century CE by the
Chinese Wang Chien who wrote: "The families of Lo-yang learn Iranian
music". Inside Iran after the rise of the Abbasids, indigenous
traditions in arts, crafts and other cultural achievements of the Sasanides were
retained to such an extent that the Abbasid rule became known as the
"neo-Sasanian Empire" [Hayashi 1975:85,97]. Altogether since the age of sea trade expansion of Parthian empire in South East Asiauntil the reign of Sasanid Khusru Anushirwan, Indochinese peoples were already familiar with cultural symbols of the Iranian world, which at the time of Anushirwan's era reached its zenith in Cham-Viet areas of Southeast Asia thanks to this monarch's cosmopolitan visions and his 'justice', which took firm roots in Cham cosmology un 'The Book of Anushirwant', and later on also in the Malay Peninsula where references to the Justice of Anushirwan can be found in the literary heritage of Malaysia in 'Sejara Melayu' [Brown 1970:5], where the mention of 'Raja Nushirwan Adil' probably denotes the Malay term for 'Anushirwan The Just'.
|
|
|
Please use your "Back" button (top left) to return to the previous page Copyright © 1998-2009 The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS)
|