The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies
By: Rüdiger Schmitt
(later MPers. Nisây, Npers. Nesâ, Ar. Nasâ), the OIr. name of several Iranian regions and places, which cannot easily be distinguished from one another. They are mentioned in a variety of sources from antiquity and the Middle Ages, and already Moqaddasi (24.17) listed Nisâ (Nasâ) among the names in use for different places (e.g., in Fars, Hamadân, Kermân, Khorasan), although it is quite possible that only some of the later Nesâ names are connected with OIr. *Nisâya-. The toponymic evidence attested includes the following items:
1-OPers. Nisâya (n-i-s-a-y, rendered as El. Nu-iš-ša‚-ya, Bab. Ni-is-sa-a-a) is found in DB I 58 as the name of "a district in Media," perhaps not far from Mt. Bisotun (q.v.), where Darius I slew Gaumâta the mage at the fortress of Sikayuvati. A vráddhi derivation of this Median choronym (district name) seems to be attested in the personal name Aram. nysy (i.e., OIr. *Naisâya, literally "the Nisaean"); it occurs as the name of the father of ÷trprn AÚtarfarn "the Mede" in BP 5:16 (cf. Kornfeld, p. 109).
2-The great "Nisaean plain" (Gk. Nêsaion pedíon, Herodotus 7.40.3) in Media is often mentioned (see Arrianus, Anabasis 7.13.1, and as late as Stephanus Byzantius, s.v., and Suda, s.v. Nísaion) as the home of the tall "Median, so-called Nisaean horses" (Herodotus 3.106.2) so highly esteemed, according to Herodotus (7.40.2-4), Strabo (11.13.7; 11.14.9), and others. The suspicion is natural (though it cannot strictly be proven) that this plain is more or less identical with no. 1 (Nisâya). The Greek spelling with ê in the best Herodotean manuscripts seems to render OIr. *i. It cannot be explained (Marquart, Ê p. 72, fn. 1, and Herzfeld, 1968, p. 8) as transferred from the name of the horses, where it would be the reflex of a vráddhi formation *Naisâya- (see Schmitt, p. 123, fn. 38). Moreover, the same region seems to be mentioned already in two inscriptions of the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pileser III as Ass. uruNi-ša‚-a-a, kurNi-iš-ša‚-a (cf. Zadok, p. 118b, also for a tentative localization).
Those "Nisaean horses" were the most nimble and most famous horses of antiquity and are therefore mentioned very frequently in literary sources (see Hanslik, cols. 712 f.): They were used in Xerxes' army against Greece (Herodotus 7.40.2-4; 9.20) and were later in Antiochus IV's employ (Polybius 30.25.6 = Athenaeus 5.194e). Alexander II of Macedonia is said to have visited this plain on his march from Babylonia to Ecbatana in summer 324 B.C.E. and to have found 50,000 mares still in the royal stud-farm (a mere remnant compared to former times). This "Nisaean plain" must be sought, neither northeast of Hamadân (as often had been maintained) nor in Khorasan (as Minorsky and Bosworth, p. 966b, have it), but somewhere in the province of Kermânšâhân (see Hanslik, col. 712; Herzfeld, 1968, pp. 15 f.). If one can rely on Diodorus 17.110.5, it was, more precisely, in the Bagista‚nê region, i.e., near Mt. Bisotun. The old name of this plain possibly survived into the Middle Ages, when Yâqut (writing in the 7th/13th century) mentioned "a town in Hamadân" with the name of Nisâ (cf. Schwarz, Iran V, p. 556).
3-El. Nu-ša‚-ya (i.e., OPers. *Nisâya) is mentioned only in PF 1844:7 (see Hinz and Koch, p. 1012) as a village in the area surrounding Persepolis (cf. Koch, pp. 33, 256); it cannot, however, be located exactly. Presumably it may be identified with the town of Nisâ or Nisâyak (?) in Fars, called al-Baidáâ by the Arabs, one day's journey north of Shiraz, which is mentioned by Yâqut (Boldân I, p. 791) and other Arab geographers (see Schwarz, Iran I, p. 17; Bailey, pp. 309 f.). Again a vráddhi derivation of the toponym is attested as a personal name in Persepolis: El. Na-a-ša‚-a-ya (i.e., OPers. *Naisâya) in PF 335:15 (cf. K. Hoffmann apud Mayrhofer, p. 212, no. 8.1252; Hinz and Koch, p. 975), unless it is based on no. 1.
4-Av. Nisâiia- (acc. Nisâim; cf. Bk. Pahl. ns÷y) in Vd. 1.7 is listed as the fifth of the excellent countries and specified as situated "between Margiana and Bactria." This additional remark (cf. also Bundahišn 31.12-13), according to the Pahlavi version, means nothing more than that there exists some other Nisâya (in any case no. 1), from which it must be distinguished (cf. Nyberg, p. 316). This district was located between Morghâb Rud and Balkò Rud (see already Geiger, p. 72), i.e., approximately in the Fâryâb and Jozjân provinces of modern Afghanistan. See also Herzfeld, 1947, pp. 756 f., who identified Nisâiia- with both the place called ("middle") Nsai by Ananias (cf. no. 5) and the Parthian royal capital Nísaia/NISA (no. 7).
5-Gk. Nisaía (with several variants, among them esp. Nígaia) is the name of a town in Margiana according to Ptolemy, Geography 6.10.4; 8.23.6, and Ammianus Marcellinus 23.6.54 (Lat. Nisea); it seems to be associated with no. 4 and/or no. 6, probably in the sense that it was the capital of the district in question. This Margianian Nisaía probably is meant also by the province of Nsai or Nsai-mianak "middle Nisây" (i.e., Mpers. *Nisâ-i miyânak, as was conjectured by Marquart, Êpp. 78 f.) recorded in the Armenian Geography by Ananias of Shirak (Ps.-Mosês Xorenac`i).
6-Gk. Nêsaía (again with ê; see above, no. 2) is mentioned by Strabo 11.7.2 as a district of Hyrcania, which other authorities regarded as an independent unity (ibid.), through which the Ôchus River flows (ibid., 11.7.3); cf. Strabo 11.8.3, where, similarly, it is said to be situated between Hyrcania and Parthia. Presumably this district is to be identified with Nisiaea (perhaps to be emended to Nisaea) "the famous region of Parthia" (regio Nisiaea Parthyenes nobilis) mentioned by Pliny, Naturalis historia 6.113. It cannot be decided with absolute certainty (see Sturm, col. 711), whether or not this Hyrcanian or Parthian Nisaia is identical with no. 4 and is related to no. 5 and/or no. 7, i.e., has to be located in Margiana. That thesis is quite imaginable, in view of the varying age of the relevant sources; it may be supported by reference to the fact that the district in question for some time could have (and indeed seems to have) belonged to a state other than the one which ruled the adjacent regions.
7-Gk. Nísaia was, according to Isidorus of Charax 12 (cf. Jacoby, Fragmente, IIIC, p. 781.15), the name the Greeks used for the town Parthau‚nisa in Parthia. This form obviously has to be understood as "Parthian Nisa" and as created ad hoc by way of distinction from other towns of the same name. Since the form of the manuscript tradition is completely isolated, it often has been doubted; and therefore it remains somewhat problematic. Isidorus (ibid.) says also that the tombs of the Parthian kings were at this place, so apparently the Parthian royal city Nisa (q.v.) is meant.
8-Gk. Nisaîoi is the name of a people whom Ptolemy, Geography 6.17.3, describes as living in the northern parts of Areia together with the Astauênoí. The latter are mentioned by him elsewhere (6.9.5) as inhabitants of Hyrcania; cf. also the name of the district Astauênê between Hyrcania and Parthia in Isidorus of Charax 11 (cf. Jacoby, Fragmente, IIIC, p. 781.11). Therefore these Nisaîoi actually seem to be the inhabitants of Parthian Nísaia/Nisâ (no. 7), as already Marquart (Êrânšahr, p. 78, fn. 6) had claimed.
On condition that all the names listed above belong together, continuants of the name Ir. *Nisâya- are used both as toponyms proper and as "choronyms" denoting regions or districts. This has consequences for the etymology. In Iran it is common practice that choronyms are narrowed down, as time goes on, to toponyms (see Eilers, 1977, pp. 277 ff.), so it is natural to start from the choronym in the present case also. This form, with its remarkable s, long (cf. already Bartholomae, AirWb., col. 1086) has been interpreted as OIr. *ni-sâya- "place of lying down, resting-place, settlement, encampment," derived from the root of Av. saê/saii = Ved. s‚ay "to lie," i.e., PIE. *k ´´eÁ with prefix ni- "down." (For this combination Bailey, p. 309 referred to Wâkòî n™s(™)y- and Oss. D. nissœjun "to lie down," whereas Bartholomae, ibid., could only compare the adjectival derivative OIA. ni-s‚ây-in- "lying.") Such a designation may well be seen in connection with nomadism (see Chaumont, p. 143, fn. 1), but on no account can it mean "low-lying place, valley," as some authors supposed.
On the other hand
Klingenschmitt, p. 21 equated OPers. Nisâya-
with Munèî nəsəy
"the shady side of a valley" (cf. already Morgenstierne,
pp. 52, 233a, and Yidgha nichâγ
Copyright © 1998-2015 The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS)