cais1.gif (153930 bytes)

CAIS Persian Text.gif (34162 bytes)


The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies

 Persian Section.PNG (9914 bytes)


About CAIS


Daily News

News Archive


CAIS Seminars

Image Library





Contact Us


Facebook-Button.jpg (107165 bytes)




By: Prof. Josef Wisehöfer



FRATARAKA "leader, governor, forerunner" (fratara- ; Av. fratara- "fore-, former"; BSogd. prtr; cf. OInd. pratara‚m, Gk. proteros; Brandenstein and Mayrhofer, p. 119), ancient Persian title.


In the Achaemenid period

Frataraka was the title of the administrative head of a district or province in Egypt (q.v. i), immediately under the satrap at Memphis. Three fratarakâ are known by name from Egyptian Aramaic papyri: rmndyn- *Ramnadainâ (Porten and Yardeni, I, p. 41; Cowley, no. 20 l. 4), in 420 B.C.E. in the district tštrs, to which Elephantine (q.v.) belonged; wydrng- *Vidranga (?; Porten and Yardeni, II, pp. 63, 69; Cowley, nos. 27 l. 4, 30 l. 5, 31 l. 5), from 410 B.C.E. onward in the same district; and gršpt- *Garšapati-, in the district of Memphis in the fifth year of Darius II (419 B.C.E.; Segal, 27:5). The frataraka of the southern province of Egypt was superior to the commander of the garrison (rab haylâ) of Syene in both military and administrative matters (Porten and Yardeni, II, pp. 69, 73; Cowley, nos. 30 l. 5ff., 31 l. 5ff.); whether he or the rab haylâ or both were called sgn (segan) in judicial contexts remains a matter of debate.


In the Post Achaemenid and Parthian periods

The dynasts of Fârs in the 2nd century B.C.E. used the title in the formula X, prtrk÷ ZY ÷LHY÷ (X, frataraka of the gods) in the Aramaic legends on their coins (read variously as fratakara, fratadâra, fratakâra). The divine or semi-divine beings they served cannot be identified with certainty, as ÷LHY÷ may be read in Middle Persian as both yazdân (deities, i.e., Ahura Mazdâ and perhaps other Persian gods) and bayân (godlike [kings], i.e., Achaemenids or Seleucids).

The fratarakâ bgdt (Baydâd), rthštry (Ardaxšîr I), whwbrz (Vahbarz, mentioned as Oborzos in Polyenus 7.40), and wtprdt (Vâdfradâd I) were long considered to have been independent, anti-Seleucid rulers of Persis in the 3rd century B.C.E. It is much more probable, however, that they began as Seleucid representatives in Fârs (cf. Strabo, 15.2.34) just before the end of the 3rd or in the first decades of the 2nd century B.C.E. and that Vahbarz or Vâdfradâd gained independence around mid-century, when Seleucid power crumbled in southwestern Persia and the Persian Gulf region. On their coins the fratarakâ iconographically stressed their close ties to the Achaemenid kings but did not claim power outside the borders of Persis: They were not depicted wearing the upright tiara and did not call themselves "great kings." That the Arsacid Mithridates I (ca. 171-38 B.C.E.) left Persian dynasts in office with the right to mint coins (later with the title MLK÷ "king") is further evidence of their modest claims and of a sub-Seleucid phase of frataraka rule. It is more probable that the Arsacids restored conditions existing before Vahbarz than that they granted an entirely new partial autonomy, especially as they were under heavy pressure from the Seleucids, Sakas, and Mesenians between 140 and 126 B.C.E.

As only general political symbols predominate on frataraka coins and as dynasts are depicted wearing the "royal" tiara on the first series of Baydâd's coins but subsequently the "loose" tiara of satraps (not magi, as previously thought), the fratarakâ should no longer be considered priestly dynasts or exponents of religious (and political) resistance to Hellenism. Their seat was presumably at Persepolis, where they sponsored intense building activity both on and near the Achaemenid terrace (cf. the reliefs of a frataraka and perhaps his spouse in a building northwest of the terrace).


M. Alram, Nomina Propria Iranica in Nummis, Iranisches Personennamenbuch 5, Vienna, 1986. 

W. Brandenstein and M. Mayrhofer, Handbuch des Altpersischen, Wiesbaden, 1964. 

A. E. Cowley, Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century B.C., Oxford, 1923. 

B. Porten and A. Yardeni, Textbook of Aramaic Documents from Ancient Egypt, Jerusalem, 1986-89. 

J. B. Sagel, Aramaic Texts from North Saqqara with Some Fragments in Phoenician, London, 1983. 

J. Wiesehöfer, "PRTRK, RB HYL und MR," in H. Sancisi-Weerdenburg and A. Kuhrt, eds., Achaemenid History VI. Asia Minor and Egypt: Old Cultures in a New Empire, Leiden, 1991, pp. 305-9. 

Idem, Die "Dunklen Jahrhunderte" der Persis. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte und Kultur von Fârs in frühhellenistischer Zeit (330-140 v. Chr.), Munich, 1994.



Top of Page



Source/Extracted From: Encyclopaedia Iranica


Please note: CAIS has the privilege to publish the above article originating from the above-mentioned source, for educational purposes only (Read Only). This article has been published in accordance with the author(s) / source' copyright-policy -- therefore, the ownership and copyright of this page-file remains with the author(s) / sourceFor any other purposes, you must obtain a  written permission from the copyright owner concerned. (Please refer to CAIS Copyright Policy).



my_Iran.jpg (13682 bytes)

"History is the Light on the Path to Future"


Persian_NOT_Farsi_by_Shapour_Suren-Pahlav_3D2.gif (177309 bytes)


Encyclopaedia Iranica

BIPS.jpg (15695 bytes)

The British Institute of Persian Studies

"Persepolis Reconstructed"

Persepolis_reconstructed2.jpg (36944 bytes)


The British Museum

The Royal

Asiatic Society

Persian_Gulf_Facebook.jpg (1935028 bytes)

The Persian Gulf

Facebook Page

Please use your "Back" button (top left) to return to the previous page

Copyright © 1998-2015 The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS)