|


CAIS
The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies
[ Home ]
[ About CAIS ]
[ Articles ]
[ Daily News ]
[ News Archive
]
[
Announcements ]
[ CAIS Seminars ]
[ Image
Library ]
[ Copyright ]
[ Disclaimer ]
[ Submission ]
[ Search ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Links ]
| |
 |
|
Ancient
Iranian Homeland (Central Asian) stone artifact
animates archaeologists
|
|
|
Monday,
15 May 2001
In an unexpected benefit of the
Cold War's end, Russian and American
archaeologists say they have discovered an ancient
civilization that thrived in Central Asia more
than 4,000 years ago, before being lost in the
sweep of history.
The people of this area, the archaeologists say,
built oasis settlements with imposing mud-brick
buildings and fortifications. They herded sheep
and goats and grew wheat and barley in irrigated
fields. They had bronze axes, fine ceramics,
alabaster and bone carvings and jewelry of gold
and semiprecious stones. They left luxury goods in
the graves of an elite class.
The accomplishments of these unknown people in
what are now the republics of Turkmenistan and
Uzbekistan began to emerge over several decades of
excavations by archaeologists of the Soviet Union,
who worked diligently but in academic silence
behind closed borders.
The surprising scope of society suggested a stage
of social and economic development generally
regarded as civilization. All that seemed lacking
was evidence of number or writing systems.
With the end of the Cold War, American
archaeologists have joined the Russians in
exploring the region, and now they are reporting
that they have found inscriptions showing that
these people may have indeed had writing, or at
least were experimenting with a form of
protowriting around 2300 B.C.
"We are rewriting all the history books about
the ancient world because of the new political
order in our own time," Fredrik Hiebert, a
University of Pennsylvania archaeologist involved
in the excavation, said in an interview last week.
In the most recent and provocative discovery, Mr.
Hiebert uncovered a small stone object engraved
with four or five red-colored symbols or letters
that apparently bear no resemblance to any other
writing system of the time.
Other scholars agreed that the symbols seemed to
be unlike contemporary scripts in Mesopotamia,
Iran or the Indus River Valley.
Mr. Hiebert made the discovery last summer in
ruins at Annau, a site near the border with Iran
and only 13 kilometers (8 miles) from Ashgabat,
the capital of Turkmenistan.
He described the findings a week ago at a
symposium at the University of Pennsylvania and on
Saturday at a conference on language and
archaeology at Harvard University. "You can
say we have discovered a new ancient
civilization," Mr. Hiebert said.
At the same time, the pyramids of Egypt had been
standing for three centuries, power in the Tigris
and Euphrates valley was shifting from Sumer to
Babylon, and the Chinese had yet to develop
writing.
Victor Mair, a specialist in ancient Asian
languages and cultures at the University of
Pennsylvania, who was not on the research team,
said of the inscription, "I definitely think
that's writing."
Mr. Mair said that discovery of ruins of an
advanced culture in a region "where there was
thought to be just space and emptiness fills an
enormous gap" in terms of trade and cultural
exchange across Asia in antiquity.
It thus suggested that people in Asia more than
4,000 years ago were not as isolated as once
supposed, he said, but probably had continent wide
connections.
The dozens of settlement ruins of the newfound
civilization stretch east from Annau across the
Kara Kum desert into Uzbekistan and perhaps the
northern part of Afghanistan.
It is an area 500 to 650 kilometers long and 80
kilometers wide. Archaeologists have given the
culture the prosaic name of the Bactria Margiana
Archaeology Complex, or BMAC, after the ancient
Greek names of two regions it encompasses.
Long after the ruins were buried in sand, the area
was traversed by the legendary Silk Road, the
caravan route linking China and the Mediterranean
lands from the second century B.C. to 1700.
The oases that served as way stations for rest and
resupply on the Silk Road also supported the BMAC
civilization, which presumably was trading far and
wide over some kind of ancestral Bronze Age Silk
Road.
Carl Lamberg-Karlovsky, a Harvard archaeologist,
questioned whether the symbols on the artifact
represented true writing. But he said that Mr.
Hiebert's discovery "falls into place with
other research showing that this culture was
working out some sort of communication system,
though it never reached the level of complexity in
writing as its neighbors did."
Until the waning days of the Soviet Union, foreign
scholars knew almost nothing of the nature and
extent of the BMAC culture. Reports of findings
were confined to Soviet journals.
In the post-Cold War openness, Russian
archaeologists are eagerly sharing their knowledge
and inviting collaboration with Westerners.
Victor Sarianidi, of the Institute of Archaeology
in Moscow, found a distinctive architectural
pattern in many of the ruins. The buildings at
each site appeared to be erected in one burst of
construction according to the design of a single
architect.
The largest buildings were like large apartment
complexes, divided into dozens and dozens of
rooms.
They were surrounded by multiple mud-brick walls,
some as much as 3 meters (10 feet) thick. Beyond
lay traces of agricultural fields.
Mr. Hiebert plans to return to Annau, possibly
next month, for further excavations to be financed
in part by the National Geographic Society.
Source:
|
|
|
|
| |
|

|
|
"History is the Light on the Path to Future"
|
|


Encyclopaedia Iranica

The British Institute of
Persian Studies
"Persepolis Reconstructed"


The British Museum

The Royal
Asiatic Society

|
|