cais1.gif (153930 bytes)

CAIS Persian Text.gif (34162 bytes)

CAIS

The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies


 Persian Section.PNG (9914 bytes)


Home


About CAIS


Articles


Daily News


News Archive


Announcements


CAIS Seminars


Image Library


Copyright


Disclaimer


Submission


Search


Contact Us


Links


Facebook-Button.jpg (107165 bytes)



.


CAIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL & CULTURAL NEWS©


Professor Alizadeh's Letter to Guardian: "The Evil Empire" or Evil Intentions

 

 

 

19 September 2005

 

By Professor Abbas Alizadeh

 

Reading Mr. Jonathan Jones’ article, “The evil empire,” in your reputable newspaper (Guardian - 9/10/05) one is left with the feeling that Mr. Jones knows very little, if any, about history, art history, and archaeology. In fact, on a par with the title of the article, he immediately reveals his political agenda in his first paragraph and continues his political ramble in a thinly wrapped critique of the British Museum ’s ongoing exhibition of Persian Achaemenid “Forgotten Empire.” Lest readers may be ambiguous about Persia, he duly reminds them that it is the same as Iran.

 

This is unfortunate because at this critical time when the polarization of the world is increasingly becoming nasty, ugly, and dangerous, Mr. Jones’ article would simply serve as fodder to the attitude that in part has been responsible for today’s geopolitical quagmire we are witnessing now.

 

Mr. Jones’ primary source of information to bash Persian Achaemenids—and by extension the East—seems to be Herodotus. First, the Greeks, as Jones claims, did not invent history. History is a process. In his monumental work, The Persian Wars, Herodotus invented historical narrative, peppered with an attempt to explain historical events by appealing both to divine intervention and logic.

 

It is important to remember that Herodotus spent most of his time in Athens and wrote his book for the Greeks, and certainly with Athenian bias. While Herodotus’ book has historical value, most of his narrative consists of hearsay. To the Greeks, everybody was a barbarian, including the Macedonians and their upstart leaders, Philip and his son Alexander, who destroyed Greek city-states, robbed the Greeks of their cherished freedom, and frustrated the rapid development of Greek civilization.

 

Prior to the mid-fifth century BC, the heart of Greek intellectual achievement was not in mainland Greece but in their former colonies on the eastern Mediterranean coast. These internally independent colonies constituted the westernmost part of the Achaemenid Empire. What other colonial power could claim the development of a superb civilization in its colonies on their watch? This is not to an accolade for colonialism, which throughout history, particularly from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries, caused unspeakable atrocities around the world. The flourishing of Greek philosophy, mathematics, and geometry, to name a few, was made possible perhaps because the Persian Achaemenids, the “baddies” and “original villains” of Mr. Jones, were a tolerant nation and civilized enough to appreciate and respect cultures and nations other than their own.

 

While Darius I was busy improving the infra-structure of his empire by building highways, establishing postal service, digging a canal connecting the Nile to the Red Sea, regulating measures and weight for commerce, to name a few, Alexander kept himself busy conquering and plundering one nation after another until his death.

 

But the greatest contribution of the Persian Achaemenids was the preservation and development of the millennia-old ancient Near Eastern civilization they inherited. This brings us to Mr. Jones childish criticism of formal Persian art. Mr. Jones does not understand that ancient Near Eastern art is defined by a set of conventions that developed in the course of thousands of years, and that the Persians preserved and improved upon it. Movement, portraiture, frontal views and overlapping figures, as Mr. Jones claims, are not necessarily strong criteria to judge formal, monumental art and architecture. These characteristics can, however, be found in the minor art of the Persian Achaemenids, particularly in the gold work and utilitarian objects and glyptic.

 

While the British Museum is admirably trying to acknowledge the past achievements of a modern nation and thereby create an amicable atmosphere of good will, Mr. Jones attitude in his article has blinded him to deny the achievements of an empire that existed 2500 years ago. His political agenda, on the other hand, has led him to vilify an ancient nation and by extension the modern-day nation of Iran.

 

Abbas Alizadeh (Ph.D.)

Senior Research Associate

Director of Iranian prehistoric Project

The Oriental Institute

The University of Chicago

1155 East 58th Street

Chicago , US 60637

Telephone no.: 773-702-9531

 

 

 

Top of Page

 

 

my_Iran.jpg (13682 bytes)

"History is the Light on the Path to Future"

 

Persian_NOT_Farsi_by_Shapour_Suren-Pahlav_3D2.gif (177309 bytes)


 

Encyclopaedia Iranica


BIPS.jpg (15695 bytes)

The British Institute of Persian Studies


"Persepolis Reconstructed"

Persepolis_reconstructed2.jpg (36944 bytes)

Persepolis3D


The British Museum


The Royal

Asiatic Society


Persian_Gulf_Facebook.jpg (1935028 bytes)

The Persian Gulf

Facebook Page




Please use your "Back" button (top left) to return to the previous page

Copyright © 1998-2015 The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies (CAIS)