|


CAIS
The
Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies
[
Home ]
[
About CAIS ]
[
Articles ]
[
Daily News ]
[
News Archive ]
[
Announcements
]
[ CAIS
Seminars ]
[ Image
Library ]
[
Copyright ]
[
Disclaimer ]
[
Submission ]
[
Search ]
[
Contact Us ]
[
Links ]
| |
|
.
|
|
CAIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL
& CULTURAL NEWS©
|
|
Iranian
Archaeology Wouldn’t Grow Behind the Closed
Doors
|
|
22
February 2005
|
|
The
ancient sites of Iran were explored extensively by
foreign archaeologists before the Islamic
revolution of 1979. The work was surely
advantageous; however, some Iranians were
skeptical of their activities, believing that
their cultural heritage was being looted to find a
home outside the country - a sad experience that
led the Iranian to form joint Iranian and foreign
archaeology teams, in which the Iranian part
worked as the watchdog to guarantee that no
artefacts were exported to the other side of the
borders, and no information was kept from the
original possessors.
After the Islamic Revolution of 1979, the
archaeological activities and studies in Iran
underwent a period of lethargy, while the science
was revolutionized at the end of the 50s all
around the world, creating a new domain called
modern archaeology.
Today the world of archaeology is different from
that of several years ago; it is no more based
solely on objects discovered, and no archaeologist
travels to some country just to bring home
artefacts, and no one keeps his gained information
for himself.
Despite all, some Iranian officials and experts
are still opposing the presence of foreign teams
in their country. Some base their opposition on
the fact that Iranians suffice the domain both in
number and expertise, and others bring up the same
old fear of the historical objects being looted.
Abbas Alizadeh, an Iranian senior research
associate in the Oriental Institute of the Chicago
University who has for some time supervised
foreign teams of archaeologists working in
different parts of Iran, has talked to CHN of his
view toward the matter.
He believes that following the 20-year-long
recession in the archaeology of Iran after the
Islamic Revolution, the presence of foreign
experts in Iran has been a necessity. “During
the end of Mohammad Beheshti’s time in Iran’s
Cultural Heritage Organization, major steps were
taken in this regard, and the first team to enter
Iran was from the Chicago University, led by
myself. International cooperations gradually
expanded, with the officials in favor of new
approaches, especially wanting the Iranian experts
to be educated by their foreign counterparts,”
he explained.
Archaeology of Iran, a country rich with ancient
sites, has had its own problems, naming lack of
experts and lack of knowledge of the new
developments of the sphere. Moreover, the joint
teams have faced some problems, such as those of
language and lack of research facilities, yet the
officials are becoming more aware that the Iranian
archaeology wouldn’t grow behind the closed
doors. “Even if all the Iranian experts were at
an international level, considering the scientific
and technical matters, they were not enough to
fulfill the needs of just one province of the
country,” said Alizadeh.
It is a while now that foreign experts are working
on Iranian sites; however, it was the changes made
in the Iranian Cultural Heritage and Tourism
Organization and the appointment of the new
director general, Hussein Marashi, which boomed
the cooperations significantly.
Alizadeh believes these cooperations will help the
enthusiast Iranian students of the major and
enrich the domain from several points of view:
first of all, the foreign experts would expand
their knowledge of Iran, and introduce the country’s
archaeology to their students back at home;
secondly, the foreign students working with the
experts in Iran would return to their countries as
Iranologists. As a result, studies of Iran would
be revived once again around the world.
Lots of works should still be undertaken to pave
the way toward virtually joint activities. For
example, a proper definition of a joint team and
its activities, and some regulations should be
provided to facilitate the joint archaeological
activities in Iran. Moreover, administrative
conditions, such as visa endorsement, should be
eased.
Alizadeh names the current times the transition
era of Iranian archaeology, the advantages of
which will appear in time if proper measures are
taken.
Top
of Page
Relevant
News:
|
|
|
| |
|

|
|
"History
is the Light on the Path to Future"
|
|


Encyclopaedia
Iranica

The
British Institute of Persian Studies
"Persepolis
Reconstructed"


The
British Museum

The
Royal
Asiatic
Society

|
|